Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 6, 2007 at 19:04:29

Election activist aims to test Sequoia machines in Nevada

by Patricia Axelrod     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

http://www.robkall.com

Tell A Friend

 I  would like it to be known that my strategy here in Nevada is to prove that Sequoia machines are broken.  Only then can we advance to either 'fix' or

replace  these machines altogether.  As Nevada spent a total of  37 million (21 million from HAVA pool, 15 million additional for Clark County alone and almost a  million  more in Nevada matching funds) to buy these damnable Sequoia machines I hope that people outside of  Nevada understand that independent testing of these machines is the only way to prove that Sequoia machines are

 'broken." Sequoia put on a dog and pony show today for Nevada's legislators and I was there armed with and poised to ask hard questions.  Sequoia consistently  replied that I was a liar or that I did not have my facts straight.

 I am hoping to amend Nevada SB 492 to include provision for independent testing of Sequoia's machines.  If I am successful in even placing the

 conversation before the legislators I aim to import all the citizen activists and other experts that I  can gather to come to the defense of Nevada election

 justice. Please address this email to all election integrity activists as well as Senator Hosford and other Nevadans interested in election justice.  

 Solidarity,

Patricia Axelrod

 From: patricia axelrod 

 Hello Senator Horsford and other good Nevadans:

 We need to amend SB 492 to include the testing of all of Nevada's Sequoia AVC Edge with Verivote Printer voting machines.  These machines are rife with

 product defect as is evident by laboratory results from Wyle and Compuware Laboratories as well as demonstrated by use of the machines in Nevada, Chicago City, California and other states.   

 Nevada deserves fair, accurate and reliable elections that are not wholly possible with the use of Sequoia Voting Systems. Nevada's Sequoia machines are still under warranty until December 2007. I propose that SB 492 be amended to include provision for testing and fixing Nevada's machines - now before 2008 -while the machines are still under warranty. Vote watchdogs (like me) and politicians across the country from Florida to Texas to Missouri to California  have awakened to the undeniable fact that the use of computer driven voting machines - like those manufactured by Sequoia - is an open

 invitation to vote fraud and election chicanery.   

 A gander at the attached email will inform you of the stupendous change underway in TX where a bill  has been introduced to ban the use of electronic

 computer driven voting machines such as the ones in use here in Nevada. This Texas bill would replace the electronically cast, computer counted ballot

 1  |  2

 

Patricia Axelrod is a Reno, Nevada-based weapons-systems analyst and expert in Gulf War I illnesses.

Contact Author

Contact Editor

View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments


Kathy Dopp

Great Patricia - John Gideon & I Investigated NV's "Audits"

FYI,

 Nevada's SOS claims that NV conducted audits of the VVPATs and found a 100% match between paper and electronic counts.

 John Gideon and I independently called county election officials to see what audit procedures they followed and we both found, at least with the officials we managed to speak with, that no manual counts of the VVPATs were actually done, and rather that the alledged "audits" involved printing out the contents of the electronic memory cards and then comparing the printouts with the vote counts.

 In other words, NV tested the voting machine print programs and found that the print programs indeed did work, and then wrongly claimed that their "audit" found a perfect match between paper and electronic records.

 This may not have been the case in all counties, but the NV county officials I spoke with said that they sealed the VVPATs and never looked at them.

 Good luck on your efforts.

 Kathy

by kdopp (30 articles, 0 quicklinks, 6 comments) on Saturday, April 7, 2007 at 4:23:26 PM
 

 

1 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2007

 

Tags for This Article:

United States Of America (2196)  Electronic Voting (341)  Voter Disenfranchisement (283)  Voting Technology (234)  Voting Machines (217)  Voting Laws Federal HAVA (174)  State Government (97)  GrassRoots (76)  Corporations Voting Machine (52)  Corporations E-Voting (50)  Nevada (11) 

Populum Tag Cloud
Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
All Articles
Diaries
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Also Sub-levels